A Land Dispute Ends in Carnage
 |
Horror survivor Sapat Khan had gone to pray only to get shot in the leg
Photos: Tarun Sehrawat
|
|
IT WAS 14 September. Maulana
Rashid, 27, owner of an automobile repair shop in Andhwadi village, had
gone to Gopalgarh for some personal work. Finishing work in the
afternoon, he went to the Masjid-e-Aisha for namaaz before returning
home. A decision that cost Rashid his life. At 5 pm, the whole town of
Gopalgarh erupted in violence and the mosque was the epicentre of it
all. Rashid, like eight others, was shot inside it. On 14 September,
Gopalgarh, a small town in Rajasthan 80 km away from Bharatpur,
witnessed one of the worst carnage the town has ever seen. Nine people,
all belonging to the Meo community, were killed and around 30 were
injured. Of the 30 injured, 26 were Meo Muslims and four were Gujjars.
On 21 September, the Ashok Gehlot-led Congress government ordered a CBI
investigation into the incident.
 |
|
Crime scene The inside of the mosque is covered with blood stains
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
 |
|
No faith in khaki Policemen standing guard outside the mosque in Gopalgarh
|
|
|
|
The road to the carnage was lain on 13
September, after an order asking Gujjars to vacate 12 bighas of
encroached land sparked the violence. According to Noor Mohammad, a
resident of Gopalgarh, around 12 bighas of land were purchased in 2000
to build a mosque, idgah and a graveyard. The mosque was for people from
around 38 villages. A part of the 12 bighas was encroached upon by the
Gujjars who staked claim to it. Meo Muslims of the area filed a case in
the Pahadi district court against this encroachment. On 13 September,
the tehsildar of Pahadi issued an order under Section 90 of the Land
Revenue (LR) Act, asking the Gujjars to vacate the land. Reacting to
this order, 10-15 agitated Gujjars gathered near the mosque and beat up
Abdul Rashid, the imam of the mosque. The group threatened that they
would not vacate the land.
On hearing that the Imam had been attacked,
angry Meo Muslims gathered near the masjid, and the Gujjars gathered at
the house of Abu and Sher Singh, local leaders in the market of
Gopalgarh. Several rounds were fired in the air from both sides. Sensing
the situation could go out of hand, leaders from both sides suggested
that they go to the local police station to resolve the issue. A
five-member team from each community was chosen to talk to the police.
Sher Singh, leader of the Gujjars, even agreed to apologise to the Imam.
At that time, local leaders from Bajrang Dal
and the VHP, claim Meo Muslims, started floating the rumour that four
Gujjars had been killed by Muslims and no compromise could be
acceptable. This spread like wildfire and within no time the whole town
was simmering with tension. The Muslims also allege that these leaders,
aided by a sizeable number of Gujjar policemen, literally forced the
Collector into signing the order to open fire. The Meos allege that
their mosque was surrounded by the police in riot-control vans and
Gujjars attacked the mosque. In the firing that lasted close to an hour,
nine Meo Muslims were killed and close to 30 were injured. What was
even more shocking was that three to five bodies were burnt and thrown
into a well inside the adjacent idgah. Several makeshift shops belonging
to Meos were also burnt down. The Meos allege that the local police was
hand-inglove with the Gujjar community in playing out this carnage. The
police were prompt to deny the allegation and said they fired shots to
prevent the riot from spreading. The Collector, SP and SHOwere later
transferred under intense public pressure.
Social activist Ramzan Chaudhary says the
whole incident smacks of conspiracy on the part of the Gujjar community
and the local police, which has a sizeable Gujjar presence. "If what the
police is saying is correct," he says, "that they opened fire to quell a
riot situation, then how come the dead are only Meo Muslims." When
asked by TEHELKA, the police had no reply to this question. "Even if I
agree that the police were right in their intention, then how can they
explain the burning of dead bodies and then being thrown inside the
well? Even if they say that Gujjars did it, what was the police
in-charge of the mosque doing?" adds Ramzan. The police have no retort
to this charge either. When TEHELKA spoke to the IG, Bharatpur Range,
Sunil Dutt about the burnt bodies found inside the well, he accepted
that around three to five bodies were found burnt but could not explain
how this happened.
As many as 219 rounds were fired that day, an excessive use of force by the police, says the PUCL report
|
|
FOLLOWING THIS, a
fact-finding committee of People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) also
visited the spot to conduct an independent investigation. Members of
this committee told TEHELKA that though it was initially reported in
some sections of the media that the police firing was outcome of rioting
between two communities, the reality is that there were no deaths
before the police had arrived on the scene. The report quoted highly
placed police sources who accepted that as many as 219 rounds were fired
by the cops, which prima facie appears to be an excessive use of a
measure that is supposed to be a last resort. No precautionary steps to
disperse the mob, such as lathi-charge or use of rubber bullets, were
taken. It also said that since most deaths took place inside the mosque,
there is compelling reason to think that the firing targeted only one
community.
|
Bloody September
14 SEPTEMBER 2011 Nine people, all belonging to the Meo community, were killed. 30 were injured, of which 26 were Meo Muslims and 4 Gujjars
Masjid-e-Aisha, the mosque in Gopalgarh where agitated Gujjars and the police (allegedly) fired upon those trapped inside
Three to five bodies were burnt and thrown into a well in the adjacent Idgah, a fact accepted by the IG, Bharatpur Range
According to the PUCL findings, as many as
219 rounds were fired. No precautionary measure was taken, including
lathicharge or rubber bullets
The Congress team, led by Rashid Alvi, also
inspected the spot and concluded that violence had in fact escalated
after the arrival of the police
Though Gujjars are a majority in Gopalgarh
and the adjoining villages are dominated by Meo Muslims, there has been
no tension between them prior to the riots
|
|
Additionally, the report alleges that the
mosque bore evidence of excessive vandalism, lending credence to the
allegation that after the firing, it was captured by a section of the
Gujjar community in complicity with the police. It also raised serious
questions on the conduct of the administration in handling the original
dispute concerning the graveyard land and during the crisis of 14
September. There were confirmed reports about violent confrontations
between the two communities but once the initial clash subsided around
noon, the crowd was allowed to remain at the site, and re-arm for five
hours even though the DM and SP were present. This smacks of a lax
administrative machinery, if not of complicity.According to sources, the
police firing in the air had happened at around 2.30 pm, when both
groups were armed. But when the police fired at the people inside the
mosque, they were unarmed. The police, on its part, is laying the blame
on inflammatory speeches by the Meos.
The PUCL report was not the only one to have
found the conduct of the state government wanting. A team of Congress
MPs led by Rashid Alvi visited Gopalgarh to investigate the matter.
Within 48 hours, Alvi submitted a report to Congress President Sonia
Gandhi. In his report, Alvi confirmed that excesses were committed by
the police, and that violence had in fact escalated after the arrival of
the uniformed men at the scene. The report also came down heavily on
the conduct of state Home Minister Shantilal Dhariwal, and accused him
of taking sides. The Congress-led government, facing flak for inaction,
went into overdrive and ordered a judicial inquiry and handed over the
investigation to the CBI. It also announced a compensation of 5 lakh for
the families of the deceased. Following a Cabinet meeting, Dhariwal has
taken moral responsibility for the incident and promised that the
inquiry would yield results in three months.
The harrowing tale of 35-year-old Sapat Khan
confirms the fear that hounds the Meos of Gopalgarh. Sapat, a farmer,
had gone to buy some farm products for his land, and like Rashid,
decided to offer namaaz before going back home to Andhwadi. To his
horror, he heard gunshots being fired at the mosque. Sapat hid behind a
slab and was hit by a bullet in his thigh. He was down on the ground,
when after 15-20 minutes, he saw police entering the mosque. Sapat
alleges that the police dragged him outside like an animal and threw him
inside a van. There were three other bodies in the van. That's all he
remembers before he fainted. Now walking with a pronounced limp, Sapat
says that more than being shot at, he cannot get over the fact that the
local police and Gujjars desecrated a sacred place of worship by
entering the mosque and killing people inside it.
WHEN TEHELKA visited
Masjid-e-Aisha, entry to the mosque was barred. Only after the IG
intervened were the premises opened, with strict instructions not to
take any pictures. The sight there could make one's stomach turn. The
mosque bore signs of a battle outpost with several bullet marks outside
and inside the structure and blood stains all over the place.
The underlying surprise factor in all this is
that this area has never seen violence before this incident. The
Gujjars are a majority in this area, and the adjoining villages are
dominated by Meo Muslims. Meos have customs different from other Muslim
communities. Unlike other Muslims, they don't practise inter-marriage
within their families. Other customs are also different. In fact, they
seem closer to Hindus in their way of life.
Shamser Singh, a resident of Gopalgarh, is
alarmed. "I am amazed at the intensity of the violence of 14 September,"
he says. "There has been no tension between Meos and Gujjars until now.
Even families who have lost their sons or fathers in this carnage admit
that they have had no problems with the Gujjars in the past."
So why did this violence happen? Nobody in Gopalgarh and adjoining villages has an answer to this question.
A pall of gloom has descended on Gopalgarh,
and threatens to turn it into another tension-filled part of India with
communal feelings colouring the fabric of daily life. Though a judicial
inquiry and a CBI investigation have been ordered, work is yet to start
on the ground. The victims of this carnage are also not too hopeful.
Sixty-five-year-old Hazar Khan, father of the deceased Rashid, rues,
"Yes, the government has ordered a CBI investigation, but will the dead
get justice? Will that inquiry remove this disturbing thought in my head
that my son was not only killed, but burnt by the very same people who
were supposed to protect him?"
Hazar and others allege that bodies were
burnt by Gujjars under the protection of the police. Whether the truth
comes out or not, Gopalgarh has already found its way into the annals of
communal violence of this country.
From Tehelka
Brijesh Pandey is a Special Correspondent with Tehelka.
A special director of the Intelligence Bureau (IB) is understood to have
recently told the state police chiefs that the Hindutva activists have
either been suspected or are under investigation in 16 incidents of bomb
blasts in the country.
